Discover key AML red flags in real estate and how institutions can detect and manage money laundering risks in property transactions.

Real estate has long been one of the most attractive channels for money laundering.
High transaction values, complex ownership structures, and cross-border flows make property an efficient way to turn illicit funds into seemingly legitimate assets.
Regulators across Europe are well aware of this. Controls are tightening, expectations are rising, and scrutiny is increasing, particularly with the upcoming EU Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA).
In this article, we'll highlight some key red flags to watch for and what institutions need to do to strengthen their AML controls in the real estate sector.
Property transactions offer criminals a combination of scale, opacity, and long-term value. Several factors make the sector especially vulnerable:
As a result, regulators are escalating enforcement and expanding reporting requirements across the sector.
Financial institutions and real estate professionals are expected to identify and investigate a range of warning signs. The following indicators appear most frequently in real estate-related money laundering cases.
A buyer who cannot credibly explain where the money comes from presents a significant risk, especially when the explanation does not align with their known profile.
Common examples include:
Criminals often attempt to conceal identity through offshorecompanies, trust arrangements, layered ownership structures, and nominee directors.
Identifying the Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) is essential for any meaningful risk assessment.
Certain payment behaviours should trigger closer scrutiny:
Patterns like these are often early indicators of laundering activity.
Politically exposed persons and their relatives or close associates carry a higher risk of corruption-related money laundering.
PEP and RCA screening must be comprehensive, continuously updated, and applied throughout the entire customer lifecycle, not only at onboarding.
To reduce visibility, criminals may distance themselves from transactions by involving family members, business partners, and/or representatives with no clear commercial role.
This behaviour is particularly common when public exposure or reputational risk is a concern.
Pricing that deviates significantly from market norms can signal:
Both overpricing and underpricing warrant enhanced due diligence.
Rapid resale, often referred to as flipping, may indicate:
In real estate AML, transaction velocity is often as important as transaction value.
Legitimate buyers typically engage with:
A noticeable lack of interest in these aspects can be a behavioural red flag.
For institutions involved in property financing or property-linked transactions, Trapets supports a risk-based approach to AML through an integrated set of capabilities:
Detection alone is not enough. Institutions should reinforce their frameworks through a combination of policy, process, and training:
Criminal networks continue to view real estate as a low-friction entry point into the financial system. Make sure your institution does not become their next opportunity.
Book a demo with our specialists to see how you can identify AML risks in your company.
Sign up to our newsletter to receive the latest news within the financial crime industry and to receive invitations to our webinars.